Theory of impersonality refers to the concept of
impersonal relationship between a man as a poet and as a general man. According
to the renderer of this concept T.S.Eliot, a poet should have two distinct
personalities and he as a poet should uphold no any relation with that of his
personal self while composing his poetry. That is to say the poet entirely
disregards the autobiographical nature of the poetry as was prevalent in the
romantic age. Eliot says that while composing poetry a poet shouldn’t have a
personal self or being which is backed up by several personal experiences or
backgrounds and whilst composing poetry he shouldn’t be even slightly
influenced by any of his personal, historical experiences that may lay even a
minimal impact over his poetic composition. The personal experiences are not to
be associated with the theme of the poetic composition but rather to be kept
identical and separate from it. As of this reason he even regards two
constituents of composing the poetry; the personal elements, i.e. the feelings
and emotions of the poet and the other one being ‘the impersonal element’ which
is the ‘tradition’ or the accumulated knowledge, information and wisdom
acquired from the past by the poet. These two elements fuse together to form a
new thing, which is called poem.
The
emotions and feelings however uphold an inferior or lower place to thought and
feelings and according to Eliot poetry instead of being an expression of
emotions is rather an escape from the personal emotions. The primary reason
being, if the emotion that the poet uses, which is moreover his personal
emotion, to write his poetry and if he’s intermingling them with his poetry
then he is making his work rather more personal than general. Moreover the
personal experiences that he has are resultants of some emotions that he had previously
experienced as a distinct man than a poet; these emotions are since his own and
so are his words that he uses in expressing those emotions of his. These words
however since considers his personal emotions may or may not concern the
readers.
A poetic composition by a poet, in general, is done
for the masses or the readers to read for masses to read for and not for his own
personal sake to attain an emotional balance by giving words to his contained unexpressed
emotions. His emotions are, on the other hand, not necessary to be the same as
that of the readers and thus the poet stands a very low chance of sympathy or
empathy through it, which according to Eliot is highly likely and thus becomes
the basis of his rejection of same personality or being working as a poet and
himself instead of keeping both the personalities estranged as far as
practicable. Also, the composition based on own personal feelings mightn’t
yield enough readers to the poetry thus consequently harming and hampering the
person’s status as a poet. Thus Eliot propounded this theory to distinguish
both the personalities to make poems more artistic than emotional works.
He elaborates his idea by saying that the emotions and the experiences in the art are different from the emotions and experience of the artist
ReplyDeleteNot precise
ReplyDeleteNot Soo good at all
ReplyDelete